Reign Assurance is being built with the people who will have to rely on it.
Which checks, which exceptions, in whose format. Those answers do not come from us, and a product that decides them on its own arrives at a review and fails it. So we are designing it in the open with a small number of organizations, on a scope written down at the start.
Reign Assurance is not sold and is not shipping. This page is an invitation to shape it, not an offer to buy it. Scope is agreed first, and the effort and the commercial relationship follow from it, written down before anything starts. Where every motion stands →
The industry uses this word loosely. This is what we mean by it.
Co-design is not a pilot with a discount attached, and it is not a design-partner badge in exchange for a logo. It is a working arrangement with four properties, and if any of them is missing it is something else.
Three kinds of participant, and three different asks.
A design built only from customers describes what one buyer wanted. Built only from practitioners it describes a method nobody has to operate. We want all three in the room, and we want different things from each.
What we ask for. Access to one real population of work, and time with the control function that would rely on the output — internal audit, risk, or whoever actually holds it.
What you get. The checks and the evidence format are shaped against your review, not against a generic one. Written for the CAE →
What we ask for. The regulatory shape your domain already has to hold, and an engineer who can answer questions about how the process actually behaves rather than how it is documented.
What you get. The assurance model understands your domain rather than treating it as a generic workflow. How this works with Summit58 →
What we ask for. Method. What your practice actually does in a review, what evidence it will and will not accept, and where a client’s AI work currently defeats it.
What you get. A record built to satisfy the review you already run, in vocabulary your practice uses. Commercial partnership is separate →
Co-design and commercial partnership are different conversations and can happen in either order. Taking part here does not make you a partner, and being a partner does not put you in the cohort.
Scope defines the effort, and the effort defines the terms.
Reign Assurance is not sold and is not shipping, and taking part does not change that. What co-design asks for varies enormously: a control function giving us its review method is spending hours, while instrumenting a real population of work on a live estate is engineering. So the first thing agreed is scope. The effort follows from the scope, and the commercial relationship follows from the effort. All of it is written down before anything starts, and none of it is settled by a page, which is why this one does not try to.
Four things this is not.
We would rather lose you at this section than three months in.
Bring us work that has to be defended.
One population of work, who owns it, and what a reviewer currently asks you for that you struggle to produce. We will tell you plainly whether we think co-design would be useful to you, including when we think it would not, and whether what you need is a conversation or an engagement.